Kiran Babu Tiwari1*, Mamata Khatri2, Yurika Rajbhandari2, Shruti Regmi2, Junu Hamal2, Upendra Thapa Shrestha1 and Vishwanath Prasad Agrawal1, 2
1Research Laboratory for Biotechnology and Biochemistry (RLABB), Maitidevi,
2Universal
Abstract
Sodium azide was employed to generate mutants of Actinomucetes from
Introduction
Actinomycetes are diverse groups of soil inhabiting microbes. They are aerobic Gram- positive bacteria that form branching, usually nonfragmenting hyphae and asexual spores. They comprise 63 genera and are relatively well documented because of their value in drug discovery (Williams et al. 1989). Streptomyces spp., a major group of Actinomycetes, are most populated and diverse soil bacteria producing various industrially and medically important secondary metabolites, such as enzymes (proteases, amylase, cellulase, lignase, chitinase etc.), chromogens and antibiotics (Williams et al. 1989). Streptomyces spp. produce most of the known antibiotics and, hence, are considered as model research system that has therapeutic importance. Hence, investigation of actnomycetes from different ecological niches may yield novel isolates having more useful properties.
In Research Laboratory for Biotechnology and Biochemistry (RLABB), Bhattarai et al. (2007) were the first to observe sodium azide induced mutation of Actinomycetes. Further, enhanced antibacterial property in a Streptomyces strain - a Gain-of-Function (GOF) mutation was reported by Bhattarai et al. (2007) and Tiwari et al. (2008). Hence, the study was further conducted to explore the mutagenic effects of sodium azide to the cold tolerant Actinmycetes from
Abbreviations: Ara = Arabinose, Fru = Fructose, Gal = Galactose, Glu = Glucose, GOF = Gain-of-Function, GOF = Gain-of-Function mutation, Jor = Jorsela, Kal = Kalapatthar, LOF = Loss-of-Function, Man =
Materials and Methods
Collection of soil samples: Soil samples were collected randomly from Jorsela (2800m), Namche (3450m),
Isolation of Actinomycetes: Altogether 38 Actinomycetes were isolated from 17 soil samples by dilution plate technique using SCA media(Singh and Agrawal 2003).
Macroscopic methods: Actinomycetes were identified as colored, dried, rough, with irregular/regular margin; generally convex colony as described by Williams and Cross (1971).
Purification of actinomycetes: Streak plate method was used to purify Actinomycetes (Williams and Cross 1971; Singh and Agrawal 2003).
Categorization of Actinomycete isolates on the basis of sodium azide sensitivity: Individual pure colonies were streaked on SCA plates containing varying concentrations (10, 50 and 100ppm) of sodium azide, incubated at 28ºC for 5-6 days. Based on the complete inhibition of the growth of Actinomycetes, three categories were assigned respectively as (a) Highly sensitive (<10ppm),>50ppm).
Generation and selection of mutants: Actinomycete isolates were streaked on the Starch-Casein agar plates containing sublethal concentrations of sodium azide and incubated at 28ºC for 5 - 6 days. The resulting colonies will be characterized morphologically. The colonies having morphology different from the wild type will be considered as the mutants.
Actinomycete Nomenclature system in RLABB: Wild strains were represented by a capital initial and next two small letters denoting sampling site followed by a serial number for different sample number from the same region. Small letter following the serial number represents different Actinomycete isolates from the same soil sample. e.g., Snp16d is the fourth Acinomycete isolate from sixteenth soil sample from SNP. For mutants, respective wild type name is followed by the concentration of sodium azide after a dot. Two or more mutants from a wild strain from same concentration of sodium azide exposure are represented by small Roman numbers after a dot. e.g., Snp16d.10.i is the first mutant for 10ppm of sodium azide.
Biochemical characterization: Different physiological and biochemical tests (viz., starch hydrolysis, casein hydrolysis, Tween 20 hydrolysis, urea- hydrolysis, sugar assimilation, citrate utilization test, and catalase test) were performed to characterize wild and correspomding mutants of actinomycete isolates (Williams et al. 1989; Singh and Agrawal 2003).
Result
Categorization of Actinomycetes: Nine wild isolates from SNP, 17 isolates from Jorsela, 10 isoates from Kalapatthar and two isolates from Namche were treated with sodium azide concentrations of 10, 50 and 100ppm to categorize the isolates in highly sensitive, moderately sensitive and tolerant groups (Table 1).
Table 1: Categories of the actinomycetes (n=38) based on their sensitivity to sublethal concentration of sodium azide
Sampling sites | Highly sensitive | Moderately sensitive | Tolerant | Number of isolates@ |
Sagarmatha National Park (Snp) | - | Snp16b, Snp16d, Snp18a, Snp20a, Snp21b | Snp1b, Snp1c, Snp1e, Snp19b | 9 (6) |
Jorsela (Jor) | Jor13e | Jor11g, Jor11h, Jor14b, Jor14d, Jor14e, Jor14g, Jor16c | Jor11d, Jor11e, Jor11j, Jor11k, Jor13a, Jor13b, Jor13c, Jor16b, Jor16f | 17 (4) |
Kalapatthar (Kal) | Kal8b | Kal6b, Kal16h, Kal25a, Kal25b, Kal48c, Kal70a, Kal70c, Kal70e, Kal100b | - | 10 (6) |
Namche ( | - | Nam29a, Nam29b | - | 2 (1) |
Total isolates | 2 | 23 | 13 | 38 (17) |
@Figures in parentheses represent total number of corresponding soil samples.
Of the total 38 Actinomycete isolates, two (5.3%) were highly sensitive, 23 (60.5%) were moderately sensitive, and 13 (34.2%) were tolerant. As for example, for three isolates from Jorsela, the results have been graphically presented in Fig. 2.
Figure 2 Relative growth of Jor13e, Jor14b and Jor13c upto sublethal concentration of sodium azide
Generation of mutants: Altogether 23 mutants were generated exposing eight wild strains to sublethal concentration of sodium azide (Table 2 and Fig. 3).
Table 2: Wild type strains and their corresponding mutants generated with sublethal concentration of sodium azide
Wild types* | Lethal Concentration | Mutants |
Snp16d (3) | 30ppm | Snp16d.10.i, Snp16d.10.ii, Snp16d.20.i |
Snp18a (4) | 40ppm | Snp18a.10.i, Snp18a.10.ii, Snp18a.20.i, Snp18a.30.i |
Jor11g (2) | 30ppm | Jor11g.10.i, Jor11g.20.i |
Jor11h (1) | 20ppm | Jor11h.10.i |
Kal70c (2) | 20ppm | Kal70c.10.i, Kal70c.10.ii |
Kal70e (5) | 50ppm | Kal70e.10.i, Kal70e.10.ii, Kal70e.20.i, Kal70e.30.i, Kal70e.40.i |
Nam29a (4) | 40ppm | Nam29a.10.i, Nam29a.10.ii, Nam29a.20.i, Nam29a.30.i |
Nam29b (2) | 20ppm | Nam29b.10.i, Nam29b.10.ii |
*Figures in parentheses represent number of mutants corresponding to wild type strains
Figure 3 Growth pattern of Nam29a and Nam29b in plates containing different concentrations of sodium azide (a = Nam29b and Nam29a in 10ppm agar, b = Nam29b and Nam29a in 20ppm agar, c = Nam29a and Nam29b in 30ppm agar)
Characterization of mutants: All wild type strains and their corresponding mutants were able to hydrolyse starch, Tween 20 and casein. All were urease and catalase positive. GOF mutations with respect to Arabinose (Ara), Galactose (Gal), Mannose (Man) and Sucrose (Suc) assimilation were observed among mutants from Snp18a (two, Ara), Kal70e (two, Gal; one, Man), Nam29a (one, Ara) and Nam29b (two, Suc).
Types of mutations in carbon metabolism: Various LOF mutations were observed among mutants from Snp16d (two, Gal), Snp18a (five, Man), Jor11g (two, Gal), Kal70c (two, Ara and Gal each), Nam29a (four, Gal) and Nam29b (two, Ara) (Table 3).
Table 3: Biochemical characterization of eight moderately sensitive actinomycetes to sodium azide and their corresponding mutants
Wild Type | Colony color | Colony Texture | Carbohydrate Utilization Test |
| |||||||
Mutants | Upper | Lower | Ara | Glu | Man | Gal | Fru | Lac | Suc | ||
Snp16d | OW | CB | Scr | - | + | - | + | + | + | + | |
Snp16d.10.i Snp16d.20.i | LCW | LGY | Bri | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | LOF (Gal) |
W | W | Bri | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | LOF (Gal) | |
Snp18a | CW | DB | Scr | - | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
Snp18a.10.i Snp18a.10.ii Snp18a.20.i Snp18a.30.i | DW | LB | Bri | - | + | - | + | + | + | + | LOF (Man) |
DW | LB | Bri | + | + | - | + | + | + | + | GOF (Ara) + LOF (Man) | |
DW | OW | Bri | + | + | - | + | + | + | + | GOF (Ara) + LOF (Man) | |
DW | OW | Bri | - | + | - | + | + | + | + | LOF (Man) | |
Jor11g | CW | LB | V bri | - | + | - | + | + | + | + | |
Jor11g.10.i Jor11g.20.i | DW | LY | Scr | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | LOF (Gal) |
W | W | Scr | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | LOF (Gal) | |
Jor11h | G | GY | L bri | + | + | - | - | + | + | + | |
Jor11h.10.i | Y | Y | Bri | + | + | - | - | + | + | + | No mutation in CU |
Kal70c | GW | B | Bri | + | + | - | + | + | + | + | |
Kal70c.10.i Kal70c.10.ii | GW | CB | L bri | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | LOF (Ara,Gal) |
GW | CB | L bri | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | LOF (Ara,Gal) | |
Kal70e | GW | YB | L bri | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | |
Kal70e.10.i Kal70e.20.i Kal70e.30.i Kal70e.40.i | DGW | CB | Bri | - | + | - | + | + | + | + | GOF (Gal) |
CW | LY | L bri | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | No mutation in CU | |
CW | LY | L bri | - | + | + | + | + | + | + | GOF (Man) + GOF (Gal) | |
OW | OW | Bri | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | No mutation in CU | |
Nam29a | DW | PG | Scr | - | + | - | + | + | + | + | |
Nam29a.10.i Nam29a.10.ii Nam29a.20.i Nam29a.30.i | WG | OW | L bri | + | + | - | - | + | + | + | GOF (Ara) + LOF (Gal) |
WG | OW | L bri | + | + | - | - | + | + | + | GOF (Ara) + LOF (Gal) | |
OW | OW | L bri | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | LOF (Gal) | |
OW | OW | Bri | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | LOF (Gal) | |
Nam29b | W | DW | Bri | + | + | - | + | + | + | - | |
Nam29b.10.i Nam29b.10.ii | CW | BY | Scr | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | GOF (Suc) + LOF (Ara,Gal) |
CW | BY | Scr | - | + | - | + | + | + | + | LOF (Ara) |
B = Brown, Bri = Brittle, BY = Bright Yellow, CB = Chocolaty Brown, CB = Creamy Brown, CU = tested carbohydrate utilization, CW = Chalky White, DB = Dark Brown, DGW = Dirty Greenish White, DW = Dirty White, G = Grey, GW = Greenish White, GY = Grayish Yellow, L Bri = Less Brittle, LB = Light Brown, LCW = Light Creamy White, LGY = Light Greenish Yellow, LY = Light Yellow, OF = Off-white, PG = Parrot Green, Scr = Scraped, V Bri = Very Brittle, WG = White Green, Y = Yellow, YB = Yellowish Brown
Discussion
For last seven years, RLABB has been studying diversity of actinomycetes in soil samples of Mount Everest Base Camp under CNR,
Sodium azide, a chemical mutagen, is being used in RLABB to generate various mutants of Actinomycetes isolates from soil samples collected from Khumbu, Mount Everest Base camp (Bhattarai et al. 2007; Tiwari et al. 2008). The preliminary work on sodium azide exposure to the Actinomycetes yielded some Gain-of-Function (GOF) mutations (Tiwari et al. 2008). The work was supported by International Foundation for Science (IFS) Grant – 2008. Hence, the Actinomycetes were required to be categorized into different groups before generating corresponding mutants. The Actinomycetes were categorized on the basis of their sensitivity to sodium azide.
Low concentrations (<100ppm) style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">Escherichia coli (Bendahmane et al. 2002; Kleinhofs and Smith 1976; Oliver et al. 1990). Of the total isolates, two (2/38; 5.3%) were highly sensitive and could not grow on 10ppm and above concentration of sodium azide. Similarly, moderately sensitive and tolerant actinomycetes were identified as described in Table 1. The wild type actinomycetes were first classified according to their sensitivity to sodium azide and then were further used to generate their corresponding mutants.
Various LOF and GOF mutations were characterized for monosaccharides (5C and 6C) and a disaccharide sugar assimilation. GOF mutations with respect to Ara, Gal, Man and Suc assimilation were observed among mutants from Snp18a (two, Ara), Kal70e (two, Gal; one, Man), Nam29a (one, Ara) and Nam29b (two, Suc). Similarly, various LOF mutations were observed among mutants from Snp16d (two, Gal), Snp18a (four, Man), Jor11g (two, Gal), Kal70c (two, Ara and Gal each), Nam29a (four, Gal) and Nam29b (two, Ara) (Table 3). Interestingly, many biochemical mutants were recovered for monosaccharide assimilation (Ara: three GOF and four LOF; Gal: two GOF and 11 LOF; Man: one GOF and four LOF). Actinomycetes from Namche (
The Actinomycetes biodiversity of Mount Everest base camp region can be studied in order to explore various GOF mutations; for example, antimicrobial activities may be developed in those wild Actinomycetes which donot posses the activity, antimicrobial activities may be enhanced in those wild Actinomycetes which posses low antimicrobial activities or are completely ineffective before sodium azide exposure. Other mutants can be obtained as spin-offs, which helps in understanding biochemical processes in Actinomycetes.
Acknowledgement
Authors are thankful to International Foundation for Science (IFS) for support this work.
Reference
Bendahmane A, Farnham G, Moffett P and
Bhattarai K, Tiwari KB and Agrawal VP (2007) Enhanced antibacterial activity of sodium azide treated mutant Streptomyces strain. J Nep Asso Med Lab Sci 8: 67-68.
Tiwari KB, Bhattarai K and Agrawal VP (2008) Gain-of-Function mutation in Streptomyces spp. induced by sodium azide treatment. Life Sci Mag 1(1). URL: http://www.lifesciencemag.edu.np/mutations.php
Kleinhofs A and Smith JA (1976) Effect of excision repair on azide-induced mutagenesis. Mutat Res 41: 233-240.
Oliver DB, Cabelli RJ, Dolan KM and Jarosik GP (1990) Azide-resistant mutants of Escherichia coli alter the SecA protein, an azide sensitive component of the protein export machinery. Proc Natl Acad Sci
Singh D and Agrawal VP (2003) Diversity of Actinomycetes of Lobuche in Mount Everest I Proceedings of International Seminar on Mountains –
No comments:
Post a Comment