Monday, November 30, 2009

Landmark events in the development of microbiology since 1590-2000 in chronological form

Landmark events in the development of microbiology since 1590-2000 in chronological form

Contributor

Year

Contribution

Jansen & Jansen

1590

A crude but useful microscope

Leeuwenhoek

1677

Discovered "animalcules"

Muller

1786

First classification of bacteria

Edward Jenner

1798

Smallpox vaccination

Louis Pasteur

1857

Lactic acid fermentation due to a microorganism

Louis Pasteur

1860

Alcoholic fermentation by yeast

Louis Pasteur

1864

Settled spontaneous generation controversy

Joseph Lister

1867

Antiseptic principles in surgery

F. Cohn

1876

Discovery of endospores

Robert Koch

1876-77

Demonstrated that anthrax is caused by Bacillus anthracis

Burill

1878

Phytopathogenic nature of bacteria

Robert Koch

1881

Methods of study of bacteria in pure culture

Robert Koch

1882

Discovery of Mycobacterium tuberculosis as cause of tuberculosis

E. Metchnikoff

1882

Phagocytosis

Robert Koch

1884

Koch's postulates

Christian Gram

1884

Gram-staining method

C. Chamberland

1884

Construction of porcelain bacterial filter

Louis Pasteur

1885

Rabies vaccine

Richard Petri

1887

Petri dish (plate)

S. Winogradsky

1889

Concept of chemolithotrophy

M. Beijerinck

1889

Isolation of root nodule bacteria

Behring & Kitasato

1890

Diphtheria antitoxin

Ivanowsky

1892

Evidence for virus causation of Tobacco Mosaic Disease

Kitasato & Yersin

1894

Yersinia pestis, the cause of plague

M. Beijerinck

1899

Proved that a virus causes Tobacco Mosaic Disease

M. Beijerinck

1901

Enrichment Culture Method

K. Landsteiner

1902

Discovery of Human Blood Group

Schaudinn & Hoffman

1905

Treponema pallidum, the spirochete causing syhilis

Bordet & Gengou

1906

Hemophilus pertissis, causative agent of whooping cough

Paul Ehrlich

1910

Chemotherapeutic agent for syphilis

Francis Rous

1911

First cancer virus reported in chickens

F.W. Twort

1915

Isolation of Bacteria infecting virus

De Herelle

1917

Coined the term 'Bacteriophage'

T. Svedberg

1923

Ultracentrifuge

F. Griffith

1928

Transformation in bacteria

A. Fleming

1929

Antibiotic Penicillin

Knoll & Ruska

1932

Electron microscope

M. Schiesinger

1933

First successful isolation of a virus, the bacteriophage-WLL

W.M. Stanley

1935

Isolation of TMV in its purest crystalline form

Bawden & Pirie

1937

Mating type in Paramecium

Fllis & Delbruck

1939

Mutation in virus; molecular genetics of bacteriophages begin

Kausche et al.

1939

Electron micrography of TMV

Beadle & Tatum

1941

Enunciation of one gene-one enzyme hypothesis

Luria & Delbruck

1943

Spontaneous mutation in bacteria

Avery, Macleod & Mc Carty

1944

DNA is hereditary material

Lederberg & Tatum

1946

Conjugation in E. coli.

J. Enders

1949

First successful cultivation of a virus (polio) in tissue culture

Zinder and Lederberg

1952

Transduction in Salmonella bacterium

Harshey & Chase

1952

DNA of Bacteriophage is infective (enters the host cell) and not the protein

Watson & Crick

1953

Double helix model of DNA

S. Benzer

1955

Gene having criston, recon, muton

Fraenkel-conrat Williams

1955

Reconstitution of crystallized TMV

Gierer & Schramm

1956

Infectivity of TMV resides in its RNA and its genetical competence

Issacs & Lindermann

1957

Discovery of Interferons

Salk & Sabine

1957

Discovery of first successful vaccine against polio

Jacob & Wollman

1959

Single chromosome of E. coli with circular configuration

Jacob & Monod

1961

Operon concept of gene regulation

Fiers & Sinsheimer

1962

Discovery of bacteriophage φ ϰ174, a virus having single-stranded DNA

H.D. Kumar

1962

Genetic recombination in Anacystis nidulans, a cyanobacterium (then called blue green algae)

Safferman & Morris

1963

Discovery of cyanophages

J. Cairns

1963

Semi-conservative mode of replication of genetic material in E. coli.

W. Arber et al.

1965-68

Restriction endonucleases in E. coli

R.W. Holley et al.

1965

Determination of complete nucleotide sequence in alanyl t-RNA of yeasts

H.G. Khorana & Coworkers

1970

Total synthesis of gene for yeast alanyle t-RNA, beginning of genetic engineering

T.O. Diener

1971

Discovery of viroids

Boyer et al.

1972-73

Development of DNA cloning technique

Kohler & Milstein

1975

Monoclonal antibodies

Woese & Fox

1977

Recognition of Archaea as a distinct microbial group

Nathans, Smith and Arber

1978

Restriction enzymes and their application to molecular biology

T.W. Randles et al.

1981

Discovery of virusoids

S. Prusiner

1981

Characterization of Prions

Lue Montagnier

1983

Discovery of HIV, the cause of AIDS

H.D. Kumar & Ueda

1984

First report on conjugation in a Cyanobacterium, namely Anacystis nidulans

Mullis

1983-84

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

Mullis

1986

First vaccine (hepatitis B. vaccine) produced by genetic engineering approved for human use.

Venter & Smith

1995

Complete sequence of a bacterial genome

Heidi Schulz

1997

Discovery of Thiomargarita namibiensis, the largest known bacterium

Edward Delong

2000

Discovery of marine Archaea, proteorhodopsin and other aspects of prokaryotic marine life

Edward Delong

2000

Discovery that Vibrio cholerae has two separate chromosomes.

STUDY OF SURVIVABILITY AND EFFICIENCY OF BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS IN WASTE WATER FOR BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF MOSQUITO BREEDING

A PROPOSAL ON

STUDY OF SURVIVABILITY AND EFFICIENCY OF BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS IN WASTE WATER FOR BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF MOSQUITO BREEDING

Principal Investigator:

Upendra Thapa Shrestha

Assistant professor

Universal Science College, Department of Biochemistry

Pokhara University

A. INTRODUCTORY SECTION

A.1. INTRODUCTION

Over half a century of synthetic pesticide applications had led to the emergence and spread of resistance in agricultural pest and vectors of human diseases and to the environmental degradation. The very properties that made these chemicals useful - long residual actions and toxicity to a wide spectrum of organisms - have brought about serious problems. An urgent need has thus emerged for environment friendly pesticides to reduce contamination and the likelihood of insect resistance (Ben-Dov et al., 1997) Human attempts at insect control have changed over time from natural methods to Synthetic chemical control and again now looking to natural methods as it is safe and free from pollution and other undesirable side affects (Neppl, 2000)

One such alternative is the use of microbial insecticides – insecticides that contain microorganisms or their by-products. Microbial insecticides are especially valuable because their toxicity to non target animals and humans is extremely low. Compared to other commonly used insecticides they are safe for both the pesticides user and consumers of treated crops (Neppl, 2000). The soil bacterium B. thuringiensis fulfills the requisites of a microbiological control agent against agricultural pest and vectors of diseases that lead to it’s wide spread commercial applications (Ben-Dov et al.,1999).

The main target pest of B. thuringiensis insecticides include various lepidopterous (butterfly), dipterous (flies and mosquitoes), and individual coleopterons (Beatle) species. Some strains have also been found to kill off nematodes (Edward et al.,1988) .Conventional B. thuringiensis preparations such as those registered in Germany but also worldwide are mostly derived from the highly potent strain B. thuringiensis var. kurstaki HD1, which was isolated in sixties ( Dulmage,1970).

Nepal being an agriculture based country is no exception regarding these problems. Research work shows that the use of pesticides in Nepal is increasing in total amounts. The generally used chemical pesticides in Nepal are organochlorine such as dichlorobiphenyl trichloroethane (DDT), hexachlorocyclohexane, Malathion, organophosphates, carbamates pyrethroids, fungicides as well as rodenticides. These pesticides are non-biodegradable, which have long term toxicity, accumulate in the food chain and pollute the environment. Surface run off from agricultural lands contaminates nearly all the rivers, lakes, ponds, wells etc. Pesticides residues in water may reach human through drinking water. It may also reach human through vegetables, fruits etc, if they are not properly cleaned. DDT residue has been detected in many food items including rice, wheat, meat, vegetables and milk in Nepal. Some of these products show the residual level above the safety limits of Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) /World Health Organization (WHO). The Central Food Research Laboratory, Kathmandu has also detected pesticides residues in many food samples: among the sample examined 87.5% were the milk sample that were tested and found to contain DDT (Bhattarai, 2002). WHO has estimated that one million pesticides poisoning cases occur every year causing around 20,000 deaths per year globally. Pesticide poison may lead to severe human diseases like asthma and skin disorders, enlargement of liver, cancer, reproductive problems, tumors, and spontaneous abortion psychological problems and even to some extent degeneration of nerves often resulting in paralysis. Dinitrophenols are toxic to liver, kidney and nervous system (Subedi, 1999)

The characterizations of the strains from different niches provide useful information on the ecological patterns of distribution of B. thuringiensis and opportunities for the selection of strains to develop novel bioinsecticidal products.

A.2. BACKGROUND (Previous Results obtained)

Shrestha et al. (2006 and 2007) isolated more than hundred B. thuringiensis isolates from the soil samples of Khumbu region including Sagarmatha National Park and Phereche. All the isolates were found gram positive spore forming rods. Out of 109 isolates 86 were found to have crystal protein. Two isolates, one from Sagamatha National Park and one from Pheriche were contained high mosquitocidal activity. Preliminary experiments suggested that these two isolates survived in waste water for 30 days and retained the mosquitocidal activity.

A.3. PROBLEM

Open drainage system and stagnant water body are the main sites for mosquito breeding. All mosquitoes have one common requirement--they need water to complete their life cycle. Mosquitoes lay individual eggs on the stagnant water bodies. These eggs can lay dormant for several years. These eggs hatch in 24-48 hours releasing larvae that are commonly called "wrigglers". Generally, the larvae feed on microorganisms and organic material in the water, but some mosquitoes prey on the larvae of other mosquito species too. These larvas will be changed into the pupal or "tumbler" stage within 7-10 days in preparation for adult life which are vectors for many diseases. Thus the stagnant waste water bodies containing higher amount of organic matter are the best mosquito breeding sites from where numerous mosquitoes can be generated within a very short period. Therefore the main problem of mosquito breeding is the increasing number of stagnant waste water bodies.

A.4. OBJECTIVES

A.4.1. GENERAL OBJECTIVE

To study of survivability and efficiency of Bacillus thuringiensis in waste water for the biological control of mosquito breeding

A.4.2. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES

i. To revive B. thuringeinsis isolates from those master cultures preserved in RLABB.

  1. To test the efficiency of revived Bacillus thuringiensis isolates against mosquito larva
  2. To obtain some more potent B. thuringiensis isolates
  3. To inoculate potent B. thuringiensis in waste water in lab and count colonies (colony forming units=cfus) in each 3 days to find their multiplication rate.
  4. To observe the survivability of B. thuringiensis in the waste water lab.
  5. To test the efficiency of these isolates against the mosquito larva in natural habitat.

A.5. HYPOTHESES

It is hypothesized that B. thuringiensis will survive and multiply in stagnant waste water and retain its potency so that their spray can be used in controlling mosquito breeding.

A.6. RATIONALE

Mosquitoes are recognized as a health and nuisance problem. Mosquitoes are important pests because their biting activity often interferes with outdoor activities and can transmit many diseases to people and domestic animals. In context of Nepal they are one of the major problems in transmitting vector borne diseases like Malaria, Filaria, Yellow fever, Dengue fever, Japanese encephalitis and many more viral diseases (en.wikipedia.org). The advancement in biological knowledge made available many new controlling methods of mosquito populations. The most important of them is use of microbes as killing agents for mosquito control in order to minimize the environmental side effects of insecticides. Besides it has many more advantages over the synthetic pesticides like

  • It does not leave harmful residues
  • It has substantially reduced impact on non-target species
  • When locally produced, it may be cheaper than chemical pesticides
  • In the long-term it may be more effective than chemical pesticides

Therefore the use of Bacillus thuringiensis may be the only alternative for biological control of mosquitoes instead of using synthetic pesticides.

A.7. LITERATURE REVIEW

A.7.1. BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS

Bacillus thuringiensis is a ubiquitous gram positive, spore forming bacterium that forms a parasporal crystal during the stationary phase of its growth cycle. B thuringiensis was initially characterized as insect pathogen, and its insecticidal activity was attributed largely or completely (depending upon the insects) to the parasporal crystals. This observation leads to the development of bioinsecticides based on B. thuringiensis for the control of certain insect species among the order Lepidoptera, Diptera, and Coleoptera. There are more recent reports of B. thuringiensis isolates active against other insects of order (Hymenoptera, Homoptera, Orthoptera, and Mallophaga) and against Nematodes, mites and protozoa. B. thuringiensis is already a useful alternative or supplement to the synthetic chemical pesticide application in commercial agriculture for pest management and mosquito control. It is also a key source of genes for transgenic expression to provide pest resistant in plants (Schnepf et al., 1998)

A.7.2. MECHANISM OF ACTION OF TOXIN PRODUCED BY BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS.

When a susceptible insect ingests B. thuringiensis, the protein toxin is activated by alkaline conditions and enzyme activity in the insect's gut. The toxicity of the activated toxin is dependent on the presence of specific receptor sites on the insect's gut wall. This necessary match between toxin and receptor sites determines the range of insect species killed by each B. thuringiensis subspecies and isolate. If the activated toxin attaches to receptor sites, it paralyzes and destroys the cells of the insect's gut wall, allowing the gut contents to enter the insect's body cavity and bloodstream. Poisoned insects may die quickly from the activity of the toxin or may die within 2 or 3 days from the effects of septicemia (blood poisoning). Although a few days may elapse before the insect dies, it stops feeding soon after ingesting B. thuringiensis. B. thuringiensis does not colonize or cycle (reproduce and persist to infect subsequent generations of the pest) in the environment in the magnitude necessary to provide continuing control of target pests. The bacteria may multiply in the infected host, but bacterial multiplication in the insect does not result in production of abundant spores or crystalline toxins. The usual result is that few or no infective units are released into the environment when a poisoned insect dies (Schnepf et al., 1998).


Figure 1: Mechanism of action of toxin in larval midgut.

B. METHODOLOGY

B.1. REVIVAL OF BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS

B. thuringiensis will be revived from the master cultures preserved in RLABB following Acetate selection method to avoid any contamination (Travers et al., 1987). And will be subculture on Nutrient Agar for further processing.

B.2. CHARACTERIZATION OF B. THURINGIENSIS FOR THEIR CRYSTAL PROTEIN FORMATION

Identification will be again carried out by gram staining, spore staining and crystal staining, and biochemical tests, (Claus & Berkeley 1986).

B.3. INSECT BIOASSAY FOR THE SELECTION OF SOME MORE POTENT STRAINS

Mosquito larvae will be collected from the local areas where mosquito breeds for insect bioassay. Ten Mosquito larvae will be placed in containers with 20 ml of distilled water and 5 mg of larval diet, to which will be added whole or solubilized crystals of B. thuringiensis. The larvae will be kept at room temperature and the mortality rate will be recorded with interval of 24 hrs for 3 days if required few more days will be followed up. The isolates with strong mosquitocidal activities will be further preceded.

B.4. TEST FOR SURVIVABILITY AND EFFICIENCY OF B. THURINGIENSIS IN WASTE WATER

Water from Mosquito breeding sites will be collected and B. thuringiensis isolates will be inoculated in it. Quantitative measurement of B. thuringiensis isolates will be done by Plate count method after its isolation following the Acetate selection method (Travers et al., 1987). The survivability will be tested till 30 days or more. After survivability test, the bacteria were again inoculated in waste water containing mosquito larva and the death of mosquito will be recorded in 1, 2 and 3 days and will be recorded for upto 7 days if needed. Then the death of mosquito will be analyzed for whether the death is caused due to B. thuringiensis or not.

C. OBSERVATION/RESULTS

It is expected that B. thuringiensis strains will survive in waste water for 30 – 40 days retaining their mosquitocidal activity.

D. DISCUSSION, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMEDATION

It can be concluded that the potent strains will be really novel ones if they can survive, multiply and kill those mosquito larva in the natural habitat where mosquitoes breed. Therefore our prime focus will be on survivability test of B. thuringiensis isolates in waste water. If we get success in obtaining such potent strains which will show its activity in natural habitat then we will be successful in mosquito control by means of biological method.

E. REFERENCES

Ben-Dov E, Zaritsky A, Dahan E, Barak Z, Sinai R, Manasherob R, Khamraev A,

Troitskaya E, Dubitsky A, Berezina N and Margalith Y (1997) Extended screening by PCR for even cry-group genes from field-collected strains of B. thuringiensis. Appl Environ. Microbiol.; 63: 4883-4890.

Ben-Dov E, Wang Q, Zaritsky A, Manasherob R, Barak Z, Schneider B, Khamraev A, Baizhanov M, Glupov V, Margalith Y (1999) Multiplex PCR screening to detect cry9 genes in Bacillus thuringiensis strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 3714-6.

Bhattarai S (2002) Insecticidal activities of Bacillus thuringiensis against Cules quinquefasciatus and Spodoptera litura. Central Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University.

Claus D and Berkeley R W C (1986) Genus Bacillus Cohn 1872. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology Vol. 2. (Eds. Sneath, P.H.A) <<Baltimore>>: Williams & Wilkins. pp. 1105-1138

Dulmage HT (1970) Production of spore-delta-endotoxin complex by variants of Bacillus thuringiensis in two fermentation media. J. Invertebr Pathol 16: 385-389

Neppl CC (2000) Managing Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins. Environmental Studies University of Chicago

Schnepf E, Crickmore N, Van Rie J, Lereclus D, Baum J, Feitelson J, Zeigler DR and Dean DH (1998) Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62: 775-806

Shrestha UT, Sahukhal GS, Pokhrel S, Tiwari KB, Singh A and Agrawal VP (2006) Delta-endotoxin immuno cross-reactivity of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates collected from Khumbu base camp of Mount Everest region. Journal of Food Science Technology <<Nepal>>. 2: 128-131.

Shrestha UT, Sahukhal GS, Pokhrel S, Tiwari KB, Singh A and Agrawal VP (2007) Strong mosquitocidal Bacillus thuringiensis from Mt. Everest. Our Nature 5: 67-69.

Subedi KR (1999) Insecticidal Activities and Immunology of Delta-endotoxins of Bacillus thuringiensis Isolated from Soil and Insect Samples of Nepal. Central Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University.

Travers RS, Martin PA and Reichelderfer CF (1987) Selective Process for Efficient Isolation of Soil Bacillus spp. Appl Environ Microbiol; 53: 1263-6.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosquito-borne_disease

Bacteria in Photos

Bacteria in Photos