Wednesday, December 23, 2020

“Natural Vector of Leishmania in Thailand”

Leishmaniasis, a tropical neglected disease, is a vector-borne disease caused by protozoan parasites of genus Leishmania. The parasites are carried only by female sandflies as the female flies need blood for the development of eggs.  They become infected with the Leishmania parasites while they suck blood from an infected person or animal and then transmit it to another host. Of 900 species of the sand fly, over 70 species are found to be associated with the transmission of leishmaniasis. One of the major vectors for leishmaniasis is the Phlebotomine sandfly. There are around 500 known Phlebotomine species, however, nearly 30 species are capable to transmit leishmaniasis ( https://www.who.int/leishmaniasis/en/).

 

In order to be incriminating natural vectors, they should have the following criteria. The wild females not having recent blood meal (<36 hrs) should contain promastigotes of Leishmania parasites. The anterior midgut of infected females sand flies must have infective forms of Leishmania. The flies should be attracted to and bite humans and other reservoir hosts. They have to be strongly associated with humans and any reservoir host and finally, the experimental transmission is achieved after infection from natural host species or equivalent laboratory model. To date, no published data have been documented to verify the vectors found in Thailand to prove as incriminating natural vectors according to the criteria mentioned above. Few studies have reported the presence of Leishmania DNA in female sandflies collected from different provinces of Thailand by using molecular tools. Similarly, few investigators have studied the natural habitats of the sandflies and their related host. On the basis of these characteristics, they have suspected these vectors as the potential natural vectors of leishmaniasis.

 

Chamnarn and team had collected 2401 Phlebotomine sand flies from 16 limestone caves (temperature range 26-28°C) in Kanchanaburi province, Thailand, and identified them following standard protocol. The study had updated to a total number of 26 species of sandflies belonged to the four genera Sergentomyia, Phlebotomus, Nemopalpus, and Chinius in Thailand. These are C. barbazani, N. vietnamensis, P. asperulus, P. barguesae, P. betisi, P. hoepplii, P. major major, P. mascomai, P. philippinensis gouldi, P. pholetor, P. stantoni, P. teshi, S. anodontis, S. bailyi, S. barraudi, S. brevicaulis, S. dentata, S. gemmea, S. hodgsoni hodgsoni, S. indica, S. iyengari, S. perturbans, S. phasukae, S. punjabensis, S. quatei and S. sylvatica. The most frequent cave species found in this study were P. major major and S. anodontis. The human biting species, P. major was also the first time reported from this study. They have observed ecological habitats and behaviors (host feeding, biting activity, resting areas at day time, sheltering places at night) of sandflies to identify. However, they are not concerned about whether there was a presence of Leishmania infective forms in their midguts or not. They only proposed the sand flies as potential natural vectors for leishmaniasis (Apiwathnasorn et al., 2011). Late one more species, S. mahadevani had been identified, and altogether 27 species have been reported date in Thailand to date.

 

Among these potential vectors, different studies have confirmed different species that transmit the Leishmania parasites. Kanjanopas and team collected sandflies from individual households in Hat Samran District, Trang Province, southern Thailand where coinfection of visceral leishmaniasis and Human Immunodeficiency Syndrome (HIV) had been reported. They identified the female sandflies with the help of Entomologists and finally sent them in Molecular laboratory in Taiwan. They have evaluated for natural infections with L. siamensis confirmed by amplifying heat shock protein 70 (hsp70) of Leishmania parasite by PCR method. Although other criteria had not been studied, S. (Neophlebotomus) gemmea is considered as a potential natural vector for L. siamensis (Kanjanopas et al., 2013).

 

Chusri et al. carried out active human case surveys processing blood, saliva and urine samples from 99 villagers living in an affected area in Na Thawi District. The team had also studied details of animal reservoirs including blood samples from dogs, cats, black rats, and Indochinese ground squirrels. Sandflies were collected from villagers’ houses and plantation which were identified at office of Disease Prevention and Control. The presence of Leishmania parasite in those sandflies were confirmed by amplifying parasite specific 18s rRNA followed by nucleotide sequencing. The study finally reported female S. (Neophlebotomus) gem­mea and female S. (Parrotomyia) barraudi were potential natural vectors for L. siamensis (Chusri et al., 2014).

 

Another study by Sukra and the team had reported six sand fly vectors of Sergentomyia; S. gemmea, S. iyengari, S. barraudi, S. indica, S. silvatica and S. perturbans as potential natural vectors of leishmaniasis. The team had collected sandflies from three provinces of Thailand; Phang-nga, Suratthani, and Nakonsitammarat. They had trapped the flies at 200m around the patients’ houses by CDC light traps. The traps had also been placed in other possible habitats such as cattle corrals, pig sites, stacks of leaves etc. These flies were then identified, however, their role in the transmission of Leishmania parasites was not confirmed. One of the important vectors of leishmaniasis of genus Phlebotomus, Phlebotomus argentipes, was also detected. They suspected them as potential vectors because they were found in the infected areas (Sukra et al. 2013).

 

Leishmaniasis cases in Thailand constituted only imported cases before 1999. The recent studies emphasizing indigenous leishmaniasis identify two new species, L. siamnesis and L. martiniquensis as autochthonous species among Thai patients. As reported by Chusri et al., 2014 and Kanjanopas et al., 2013, S. (Neophlebotomus) gemmea and S. (Parrotomyia) barraudi as could serve as potential vectors for L. martiniquensis (Leelayoova et al., 2017).

 

Srisuton et al. collected sand flies from endemic areas (Songkhla and Phatthalung Provinces) and non-endemic area (Chumphon Province) of leishmaniasis in Thailand. Head and genitalia dissection of pre-identified female sandflies were done for morphology identification, and the remaining parts were used to detect Leishmania and Trypanosoma DNA. One new vector identified as S. khawi was found to carry Leishmania and Trypanosoma parasites. The vector species was confirmed as a potential natural vector capable of transmitting L. martiniquensis in the human population (Srisuton et al., 2019).

 

References:

Apiwathnasorn C, Samung Y, Prummongkol S, Phayakaphon A, and Panasopolkul C. Cavernicolous species of phlebotomine sand flies from Kanchanaburi province, with an updated species list for Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2011; 42 (6): 1405-1409.

Chusri S, Thammapalo S, Silpapojakul K, Siriyasatien P. Animal reservoirs and potential vectors of Leishmania siamensis in southern Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2014; 45 (1): 13-19.

Kanjanopas K, Siripattanapipong S, Ninsaeng U, Hitakarun A, Jitkaew S, Kaewtaphaya P, et al. Sergentomyia (Neophlebotomus) gemmea, a potential vector of Leishmania siamensis in southern Thailand. BMC Infectious Diseases.; 2013 13: 333.

Leelayoova S, Siripattanapipong S, Manomat J, Piyaraj P, Tan-ariya P, Bualert L, et al. Leishmaniasis in Thailand: A Review of Causative Agents and Situations. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017; 96 (3): 534542. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.16-0604.

Srisuton P, Phumee A, Sunantaraporn S, Boonserm R, Sor-suwan  S, Brownell  N, et al. Detection of Leishmania and Trypanosoma DNA in Field-Caught Sand Flies from Endemic and Non-Endemic Areas of Leishmaniasis in Southern Thailand. Insects. 2019; 10: 238; doi:10.3390/insects10080238.

Sukra K, Kanjanopas K, Amsakul S, Rittaton V, Mungthin M, Leelayoova S. A survey of sandflies in the affected areas of leishmaniasis, southern Thailand. Parasitol Res. 2013; 112: 297302. DOI 10.1007/s00436-012-3137-x.

https://www.who.int/leishmaniasis/en/

Tuesday, November 17, 2020

SAGE Journals; Microbiology Insights "Characteristics of ..................................Kathmandu, Nepal)

 Characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated From Clinical Specimens in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal

Shesh Narayan Kandel1†, Nabaraj Adhikari2†, Binod Dhungel2Upendra Thapa Shrestha2Khadga Bikram Angbuhang1Gayatri Karki3Bipin Adhikari4Megha Raj Banjara2Komal Raj Rijal2Prakash Ghimire2

1Kantipur College of Medical Sciences, Tribhuvan University, Sitapaila, Kathmandu, Nepal

2Central Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal

3Himal Hospital, Naxal, Kathmandu, Nepal

4Nepal Community Health and Development Centre, Balaju, Kathmandu, Nepal

 

Citation: Kandel et al. Microbiology Insights, 2020, 13: 1–6. DOI: 10.1177/1178636120972695

Article first published online: November 11, 2020; Issue published: January 1, 2020
Received: April 27, 2020; Accepted: October 16, 2020

 

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

 

 

Abstract

Introduction:

Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major human pathogen associated with nosocomial and community infections. mecA gene is considered one of the important virulence factors of S. aureus responsible for acquiring resistance against methicillin. The main objective of this study was to explore the prevalence, antibiotic susceptibility pattern, and mec A gene.

Methods:

A total of 39 isolates of S. aureus were isolated from 954 clinical specimens processed in Microbiology laboratory of Himal Hospital, Kathmandu. Antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) was performed by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method using cefoxitin, and performed Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) for amplification of mecA gene in MRSA isolates.

Results:

Out of 954 clinical samples, (16.2%; 153/954) samples had bacterial growth. Among 153 culture positive isolates, 25.5% (39/153) were positive for S. aureus. Among 39 S. aureus (61.5%; 24/39) were multiple drug resistant (MDR). On AST, amoxicillin was detected as the least effective while vancomycin was the most effective. The prevalence of methicillin resistance was 46% (18/39) of which 72.2% (13/18) were positive for mecA gene in PCR assay.

Conclusion:

One in 4 culture positive isolates from the clinical specimens were S. aureus, of which almost two-thirds were MDR. Around half of the MDR showed MRSA and significant proportion of them were positive for mecA gene. This study concludes that the mecA gene is solely dependent for methicillin resistance in S. aureus but the presence of gene is not obligatory. PCR detection of the mecA gene is reliable, valid and can be suggested for the routine use in diagnostic laboratories.

Keywords Staphylococcus aureusMRSAcefoxitinmecA gene

 

PUBMED: Download

SAGE HomePage: Download PDF

 

Saturday, November 7, 2020

"Detection of ........... Infected Chicken Livers in Nepal", animals, an open access journal published by MDPI

 Open AccessArticle

Detection of Plasmid-Mediated Colistin Resistant mcr-1 Gene in Escherichia coli Isolated from Infected Chicken Livers in Nepal

Sayara Bista 1,†,Upendra Thapa Shrestha 1,†,Binod Dhungel 1,Pragya Koirala 2,Tulsi Ram Gompo 2,Nabaraj Shrestha 2,Nabaraj Adhikari 1,Dev Raj Joshi 1,Megha Raj Banjara 1,Bipin Adhikari 3,Komal Raj Rijal 1,* andPrakash Ghimire 1

 

1Central Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu 44618, Nepal

2Central Veterinary Laboratory Ministry of Agriculture, Land Management and Cooperatives, Government of Nepal, Tripureshwor, Kathmandu 44618, Nepal

3Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SY, UK

 

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

These authors have equally contributed in this study.

 

Animals 202010(11), 2060; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112060 (registering DOI)

Received: 30 August 2020 / Revised: 22 October 2020 / Accepted: 25 October 2020 / Published: 7 November 2020

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Poultry Microbiology and Immunology)

Simple Summary

The poultry industry is one of the top agribusinesses in Nepal. However, despite the government’s restriction on the use of antibiotics as growth promotors in animals, the overuse and misuse of antibiotics can be seen all over the country. Such inappropriate use of antibiotics has led to the rise of antibiotic resistance among treatment options for both human and animal pathogens. Several findings suggest the failure of colistin, a polymyxin E antibiotic (once regarded as the last resort drug), in the treatment of human bacterial infections is due to the emergence and spread of the plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene (mcr-1) among Gram-negative bacterial pathogens. The emergence and rapid transfer of resistant strains in poultry farms are associated with unwanted loss of livestock, economic burden and spread of drug-resistance to other animals, humans and the environment, as well. In this study, we characterized the mcr-1 gene from infected chicken livers, where prevalence was found to be alarmingly high. This study identifies the result of regulatory failures. Therefore, this report provides valuable reference to the policy makers so that a more effective policy can be formulated and implemented to curb the spread of drug-resistant pathogens.

Abstract

Background: Plasmid-mediated resistance to the colistin in poultry is considered as an emerging problem worldwide. While poultry constitutes the major industry in Nepal, there is a paucity of evidence on colistin resistance in Escherichia coli isolates causing natural infections in poultry. This study aimed to explore the prevalence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene, mcr-1 in E. coli isolated from liver samples of dead poultry suspected of E. coli infections. 

Methods: A total of two hundred and seventy liver samples (227 broilers and 43 layers) from dead poultry suspected of colibacillosis were collected from post-mortem in the Central Veterinary Laboratory (CVL), Kathmandu, between 1 February and 31 July 2019. The specimens were processed to isolate and identify E. coli; an antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) using disk diffusion method was performed with 12 different antibiotics: Amikacin (30 µg), ampicillin (10 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), cefoxitin (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), cotrimoxazole (25 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), imipenem (10 µg), levofloxacin (5 µg) and tetracycline (30 µg). Colistin resistance was determined by agar dilution method and colistin-resistant strains were further screened for plasmid-mediated mcr-1 gene, using conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR). 

Results: Out of 270 liver samples, 53.3% (144/270) showed growth of E. coli. The highest number (54%; 109/202) of E. coli isolates was obtained in the liver samples from poultry birds (of both types) aged less than forty days. In AST, 95.1% (137/144) and 82.6% (119/144) of E. coli isolates were resistant against tetracycline and ciprofloxacin, respectively, while 13.2% (19/144) and 25.7% (37/144) isolates were resistant to cefoxitin and imipenem, respectively. In the same assay, 76.4% (110/144) E. coli isolates were multi-drug resistant (MDR). The phenotypic prevalence of colistin resistance was 28.5% (41/144). In the PCR assay, 43.9% (18/41) of colistin-resistant isolates were screened positive for plasmid-mediated mcr-1

Conclusion: The high prevalence of mcr-1 in colistin-resistant E. coli isolates in our study is a cause of concern for the probable coming emergence of colistin resistance in human pathogens, due to horizontal transfer of resistant genes from poultry to human isolates.

 KeywordsEscherichia colicolistin resistanceMDRmcr-1


Fulltext: Download PDF

Monday, November 2, 2020

Biofilm and MBL production among imipenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species

 

ISSN 2449-8947                   MicroMedicine                   Research Article

 

MicroMedicine 2020; 8(2): 63-73

 

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4195479

 

Biofilm and MBL production among imipenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species

Yang Metok, Supram Hosuru Subramanya, Upendra Thapa Shrestha, Leandro Reus Rodrigues Perez, Nabaraj Adhikari, Niranjan Nayak

 

ABSTRACT:

 

Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species are the primary cause of nosocomial infections. The advent of Metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL) and biofilm-producing bacterial strains poses a serious threat to reserve drugs such as carbapenem. The objective of this study was to determine the rate of MBL and biofilm production among imipenem resistant P. aeruginosa (IRPA) and imipenem resistant Acinetobacter spp. (IRAS) isolates. A total of 79 P. aeruginosa and 117 Acinetobacter spp. were isolated from various clinical specimens of patients from July 2016 to January 2017 at Manipal Teaching Hospital, Pokhara. MBL in IRPA and IRAS isolates were detected by Combined disc test and E-test. Biofilm production in imipenem resistant isolates was carried out by Microtitre plate assay. Fifteen (19%) P. aeruginosa and 57 (48.7%) Acinetobacter spp. were imipenem resistant isolates. MBL producers were found among 53.3% of IRPA and 38.6% of IRAS, whereas 100% of IRPA and 82.5% of IRAS were biofilm producers. All the biofilm producer IRPA isolates were Extensively Drug-Resistant (XDR), and a larger proportion of XDR IRAS strains were of high biofilm-producing phenotype. However, the majority of imipenem resistant (80% of IRPA and 49.1% of IRAS) and MBL producing (63%) isolates were weak biofilm formers. The study demonstrated the high capability of IRPA and IRAS to form a biofilm, which was strongly related to higher drug resistance. Nonetheless, imipenem resistant and MBL producer isolates showed an analogous association with the degree of biofilm formation. These MBL cum biofilm producer isolates were better susceptible to polymyxin B and ampicillin-sulbactam.

 

Keywords: Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Acinetobacter spp.; Imipenem-resistance; MBL; Biofilm.


For Full text: Download

Saturday, October 3, 2020

Invasive stages of Plasmodium spp

 Life Cycle of Plasmodium

The life cycle of Plasmodium spp, a causative agent of malaria is divided into three cycles; sporogonic, exoerythrocytic and erythrocytic cycles. The Anopheles mosquito is the definitive host while humans or animals are the only intermediate hosts for the parasite. During a blood meal, the mosquito injects sporozoite forms into the blood circulation of humans. The sporozoites move to the liver within a few minutes and invade hepatocytes, which they develop to produce exoerythrocytic merozoites that are released into the bloodstream again. These merozoites invade erythrocytes and grow into trophozoites and mature schizonts. Merozoites that are released from schizonts reinvade new erythrocytes. Few of trophozoites are changed into the gametocytes through the asexual blood-stage which are taken up by a feeding mosquito into their gut. These gametocytes get matured to form male and female gametes. They fertilize to form a zygote and develop to an ookinete and an oocyst which are finally developed into sporozoites within the mosquito gut. The sporozoites migrate to the salivary glands and the cycle again repeats when a mosquito bites a new host which takes around 30 days.


Figure 1: Life cycle of Plasmodium spp showing different cycles and different forms (Source: CDC)

Invasive stages:

Among the various forms of Plasmodium spp, sporozoites, merozoites and ookinetes are the invasive forms. The sporozoites and merozoites are invasive stages of hepatocytes and red blood cells respectively of the vertebrate host while ookinetes invade the mosquito gut epithelial cells.

1.      Sporozoites:

Sporozoites are the most versatile stage in the life cycle of Plasmodium which is formed in the invertebrate host; mosquito and eventually differentiate in the vertebrate host; humans and animals. Sporozoites are developed within the oocysts in the midgut epithelium over the course of 10 days or 4 weeks depending on the species and environmental temperature. Normally it takes less than 7 days if the ambient temperature is 30°C or more. Sporozoites are crescent-shaped ranging from 8 x 14 mm in diameter (Figure 2). 

 

The sporozoite and salivary gland invasion in the mosquito: The motile sporozoites egress into the circulatory fluid; hemocoel through holes from the weak area in the oocyst wall. Holes are possibly produced by a combined effort of the muscular action of the gut wall and the activity of the sporozoites. Within the hemocoel, the sporozoites are distributed throughout the body of the mosquito including the maxillary palps within a day or two of their release from oocysts. These sporozoites can’t adhere to most of the tissues however they invade salivary glands and rarely midgut wall, hemocytes or thoracic muscles. The sporozoites invade the salivary glands where they accumulate and remain until delivery. Sporozoites preferentially penetrate the medial lobe and the distal portions of the lateral lobes of the salivary glands where the salivary duct is not chitinous in Anopheles species. It is estimated that hundreds of sporozoites per oocyst reach the salivary glands. Their motility is normally restricted at salivary glands and accumulated in the salivary cavities. However, they can also move to the narrow salivary duct connecting to the proboscis until they are inoculated into the vertebrate host via blood meal.

The sporozoite and hepatocytes invasion in the human: During bloodsucking by mosquito onto the host, the sporozoites are transferred to the skin of the vertebrate host. Most of the sporozoites are deposited in the dermis of the host. They can penetrate the skin and enter into the blood vessels and lymphatic systems.  The sporozoites entering the blood vessels are carried to the liver within a few minutes while those which reach to lymph nodes have to fight against the host immune response to survive. A fraction of sporozoites are inactivated by preformed neutralizing antibodies among those who are infected with malaria before. The remaining are bound by dendritic cells and stimulate the humoral and cellular immune response of the host including B-cells, CD4+ T cell and CD8+ T cells.  

Inside the vertebrate host, sporozoites undergo dramatic changes in their surface protein structure and migrate actively to reach the hepatocytes. They use surface coat proteins such as circumsporozoite protein (CSP), thrombospondin related adhesive protein (TRAP) and P36 to interact with host receptors in the hepatocytes to facilitate the entry. CSP is the most abundant surface protein and plays important role in the development, motility and active invasion of sporozoites to hepatocytes. It is also one of the major antigens in the sporozoites which are the targets of many vaccines. TRAP proteins are located in the plasma membrane and translocated from the anterior to the posterior for the invasion, and also involved in the gliding motility. P36 protein is a 6-cysteine domain protein that directly binds to the CD81 receptor (P. falciparum and scavenger receptor BI (SR-BI) (P. vivax) of the hepatocytes. The sporozoites undergo multiplication in liver cells into thousands of merozoites.

 

2.      Merozoites:

Merozoites are another invasive form of Plasmodium which are the smallest eukaryotic cells measuring 1-2 mm in size and are non-motile. They are ruptured from hepatocytes into the bloodstream where they invade the circulating erythrocytes. A typical merozoite structure looks like an electric bulb and contains an apical complex of secretory organelles (microneme, rhoptries and dense granules), mitochondria, nucleus and plastids. The inner membrane complex (IMC) just underlies the plasma membrane. The initial attachment of merozoites to erythrocytes involves weakly binding of merozoite surface protein-1 (MSP-1) of the parasite to a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchored protein.  The dramatic movement of merozoites and deformation of erythrocytes leads to the reorientation process of merozoites directing apex abutting to the host membrane.  Most of the interacting ligands are present on the apical end of merozoites. The commitment for invasion however occurs only after the binding of erythrocyte binding like proteins (EBA/EBL) and reticulocyte binding homologs (Rh proteins) to host membrane surface proteins. A number of erythrocyte binding like proteins (EBA/EBL); EBA-140, EBA-175, EBA-180, EBL-1 and reticulocyte binding homologs (Rh proteins); PfRh1, PfRh2a, PfRh2b, PfRh4, PfRh5 are associated with glycophorins, complement receptor-1 and unknown host receptors.  These protein-protein interactions facilitate the RON complex formation in which RON2 complexed with AMA-1 (Apical membrane protein). This junction triggers the release of the rhoptry bulb, providing proteins and lipids required for parasitophorous vacuole membrane to establish the space into which the merozoites can move as it invades. The entry of merozoite is powered by the actomyosin motor complex. All the surface proteins are cleaved during the invasion. Inside the vacuole, they digest hemoglobin for amino acids nutrient and side by side they detoxify the heme compound into hemozoin, a neutral non-toxic for the parasites. They rapidly multiply and develop into ring, trophozoite, and schizont stages, culminating in the formation of 16 to 32 mature merozoites. Each of these merozoites can invade a fresh erythrocyte and continue the cyclic, asexual blood-stage development.

 






Figure 3: Molecular structure of Merozoites (Source: Cowman et al., 2012) 


Ookinete

Alternative to asexual life cycle in the vertebrate host, some of the erythrocytic parasites differentiate into sexual forms called gametocytes. These intracellular erythrocytic forms take around 10 days (normally in P. falciparum) to develop into fully mature gametocytes.  The factors initiating and regulating gametogenesis are still not clear however few studies suggested that the harsh environmental condition in the vertebrate host due to antimalarial drugs and host immune response induce the gametocytes formation to escape the situation. These gametocytes show the sexual dimorphism with two distinct forms; microgametocyte and macrogametocyte. They don’t cause any harm to the host however they are the infective form for mosquito. The mature and functional gametocytes ingested by female Anopheles mosquitoes during bloodmeal are stimulated to transform into the gametes by environmental stimuli; pH, temperature and enzymatic activities in the mosquito midgut. Under the influence of changes, the gametocytes become extracellular within 8-15 min of ingestion. Soon after the exflagellation (bursting from red blood cells), the microgametes (male gametes) fertilize the macrogametes (female gametes) within the next one hour of the ingestion of blood. The fertilized macrogamete (zygote) differentiates into a single motile ookinete over the next 10-25 hrs which is an infective form for mosquito.

A mature ookinete is an elongated motile cell size ranges from 7 to 18 mm in length and 2 to 4 mm in diameter. Ookinetes use the anterior half part of the body for a linear or snake shape gliding locomotion. The upper part of ookinete is the apical complex, possessing secretory organelles called micronemes that contain the proteins involved in motility, tissue traversal and invasion.  A de novo synthesis during the transformation from zygotes to ookinete identified more than 90 proteins synthesized, most of which are involved in motility and invasion.  

Figure 4: (a) Structure of ookinete (Wikipedia) and (b) Invasion to mosquito midgut (Bennink et al., 2016

This ookinete migrates through the liquid of the alimentary bolus and passes through the defensive barrier and the microvillar network of the peritrophic matrix to invade epithelial cells in a mosquito’s stomach. The secretary organelles of ookinetes produce chitinase enzyme which seems to break down the peritrophic matrix layer. Few more enzymes involved in motility and infectivity of the ookinete are the micronemal proteins CDPK3 (calcium-dependent protein kinase 3) and CTRP (circumsporozoite and TRAP-related protein). Targeted disruption of both of these proteins make the ookinete immotile and fail to invade the midgut epithelium. After breaching the peritrophic matrix, the ookinete then penetrates the apical end of the mosquito midgut epithelium. A candidate for initial host cell membrane disruption and penetration by the ookinete is a micronemal protein with a perforin-like membrane attack complex domain called the membrane attack ookinete protein (MAOP).

Bacteria in Photos

Bacteria in Photos